<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Rules of Working</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edstrom.net/blog/archive/new-rules-of-working/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edstrom.net/blog/archive/new-rules-of-working/</link>
	<description>Embracing Change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:28:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lea McCloud</title>
		<link>http://www.edstrom.net/blog/archive/new-rules-of-working/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Lea McCloud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edstrom.net/blog/?p=226#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Peter,
RE: new rules-- e.g. wi-fi/ technology stuff.
for me, working in a smallnon-profit office, one of the main questions is:  will it really be more efficient.  technies want to imply to us that technology save time and money, but in my work world-- personal contact IS still very important--even vital-- but also, if the bleeps and burps of the &#039;new system/technology&#039; end up losing us customers or time-- or making our few employees so stressed they are not able to show up for work, then it is/was not worth the expense. .
but we can only see these things after months of aggravation (analysis?). .and by then we have lost so much time and energy in the frustration, we don&#039;t have to figure the lost opportunities, etc. 
I personally use more intuition to trust these decisions (and wait until they are actually necessary to replace my old broken stuff-- like buying a car after it is worn out). .than always trying to be &#039;on top&#039; of the newest stuff.
For many, they are toys. .and they are a distraction.  
i.e.. .texting through phones.. .
which will probably lead to many workplaces having to write new personnel policies about appropriate cell phone behavior at work.
a tool is a tool when it is not used inappropriately as a diversion (toy).
how do we demonstrate/teach to our younger employees these fine lines of discretion?
Lea</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter,<br />
RE: new rules&#8211; e.g. wi-fi/ technology stuff.<br />
for me, working in a smallnon-profit office, one of the main questions is:  will it really be more efficient.  technies want to imply to us that technology save time and money, but in my work world&#8211; personal contact IS still very important&#8211;even vital&#8211; but also, if the bleeps and burps of the &#8216;new system/technology&#8217; end up losing us customers or time&#8211; or making our few employees so stressed they are not able to show up for work, then it is/was not worth the expense. .<br />
but we can only see these things after months of aggravation (analysis?). .and by then we have lost so much time and energy in the frustration, we don&#8217;t have to figure the lost opportunities, etc.<br />
I personally use more intuition to trust these decisions (and wait until they are actually necessary to replace my old broken stuff&#8211; like buying a car after it is worn out). .than always trying to be &#8216;on top&#8217; of the newest stuff.<br />
For many, they are toys. .and they are a distraction.<br />
i.e.. .texting through phones.. .<br />
which will probably lead to many workplaces having to write new personnel policies about appropriate cell phone behavior at work.<br />
a tool is a tool when it is not used inappropriately as a diversion (toy).<br />
how do we demonstrate/teach to our younger employees these fine lines of discretion?<br />
Lea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

